This saw has been the subject of much discussion
recently. I purchased one a month ago to
make the vertical cuts for the hinges on Roubo bookstands. I have a good coping saw, but the pins on the
blades require an unsightly hole for interior cuts. I also wanted to use it for wasting dovetails
as I have found the coping saw to be unsatisfactory for this purpose.
This saw is very expensive, approximately five times the
cost of a standard fretsaw. I have come to
the view that you should pay what you have to for an excellent
tool or do without, but I am also of the view that there is a point beyond
which spending more doesn't result in a tool that works much better. So, my question was whether the Knew Concepts
fretsaw is a good value. I find that it
is.
There are four main advantages of this saw as far as I am
concerned. The rigidity of the frame is
obvious and quite noticeable, particularly since it feels virtually weightless. This
translates directly into blade rigidity.
The quick release tensioning mechanism and it's adjustment wheel allow
you to quickly and repeatably tension the blade. The blade holders hold well and work
quickly. I found that the first two
features mean a rigid blade that translates to precise cuts. The last two features mean that if you need
to remove and reinstall the blade repeatedly for multiple interior cuts, you
can do so quickly.
Several observations may be helpful to you. One criticism I read is that it doesn't cut
thicker stock well, 4/4 for example. Lee, the
developer, will tell you that this is a function of the blade you choose. I took his advice
and purchased Pegas SK-7 blades, a 7 tpi skip tooth pattern. They cut well. I have been able to quickly saw out dovetail waste very close to the line.
The frame is so rigid and the tensioning mechanism so
effective that I was concerned about overdoing it. Although I suspect that the blade would break
before the frame was damaged, I decided to ask Lee anyway. Lee responded:
"When you cause the back spine to get kinda'
floppy...you have gone too far:-) You
should get a nice clear "ping" when you use your finger nail to
"twang" it. Beyond that, it is a matter of preference, and whether
you can hew the line as you are sawing. I cannot be more specific, as it varies
depending upon your blade choice."
The only other criticism I have seen is that the handle is
poor in appearance. It is. It's unsanded and unfinished. Lee responded (on Woodnet) as follows:
"First of all, the handle that I chose was not designed
to be "purty". It, like all of the products that I make are designed
for function, and the plain waxed handle is an excellent choice for those that
use the saw for hours at a time. It does not slip around in your hand, and
absorbs sweat. However, there has been
enough gripes about the handle that I had a new handle commissioned that will
replace both the red handle and the plain waxed one."
There are replacement handles available but they are
expensive. I had intended to sand and
finish mine, but now I think I will leave it alone. If this bothers you, you may want to inquire
about making sure you get one of the new handles.
I highly recommend this saw and think it is worth the money.
How about a post on your tool chest? (came to your blog after seeing your post on woodnet about your tool chest -- I was interested in seeing how you'd arranged the interior)
ReplyDelete--Matt
Hello, I read this post today and I want to thank you for sharing these info. Keep writing :)
ReplyDelete